Mission Planning Project
Cory Mathews, Duncan Mulgrew, Ethan Hood, Nicholas Hansen, Trevor
Redpath
Wildfires can be a very dangerous
event, not just for the victims that get struck by the wildfire, but for the
firefighters fighting the fire. Forests can be disorienting and especially so
when its burning all around a person. Something that can help firefighters is
having an aircraft acting as an “eye in the sky”. One way to accomplish this
cheaply is with an unmanned aerial platform, as full sized aircraft can be
expensive.
The
flight is required to be over peaceful pines, where a large forest fire is
occurring. This area is surrounded by high mountains and will make landing and
taking off for large fixed wings difficult, making the base camp location
critical. The basecamp and subsequent ground station will be located to the
southwest of the fire, as we will be expecting winds from the west and as
stated in a large area capable for launching and taking off unmanned platform.
As the flight has no definitive end time an unmanned vehicle will be required
to be in the air for long periods of time. The mission will require the
platform chosen to fly an orbit around the affected area to provide real time
data and information to the firefighters on the ground. Having the unmanned
platform at a set altitude will also keep it out of flight paths of other
aircraft in the area, as this is the plan that Dr. Hupy outlined in lecture. As
Dr. Hupy is experienced in unmanned firefighting we based our plan around what
he discussed in lecture to know that it is a current and modern solution.
As
we will be operating in a densely forested, complex area this mission requires
a capable and versatile aerial platform for it to succeed. The Insitu Scan
eagle is well suited to the mission, it can be launched and recovered from a
relatively small area, and it has very good flight endurance. The Scan eagle
was selected based on the assumption of a large budget. Smaller, cheaper
systems like the C-Astral Bramor or DJI Matrices were considered, but we
decided on the scan eagle as it would take many smaller aircraft to match the
capabilities of one Scan Eagle. Having a fleet of smaller aircraft would also
create a larger logistical challenge for the operation, as they would need to
land and be recharged/rotated very frequently while the scan eagle can stay aloft
for more than 18 hours. While more expensive than many other small to mid-sized
UAS the Scan Eagle is still cheaper than a large UAS (RQ-9) or a manned aircraft.
The
Scan eagle launches and is recovered from a trailer mounted catapult and sky
hook system that can be set up in just 20 minutes (Insitu, 2019) . We
anticipate operating from a forested area, this means it would be impossible to
use systems that require a road or runway to launch or land, as we might not be
able to consistently operate from large roads. A dense forest also rules out a
parachute recovery as there would need to be a large area for it to land, to
avoid any risk of it ending up in a tree. A potential solution other solution
would be a VTOL platform, but the endurance and payload would be greatly
reduced in that case
The
scan eagle has an endurance of 18 hours with a payload of up to 20lbs. (Insitu, 2019) These specs
are perfect for our mission as we plan on carrying multiple sensors at once,
and the less we must land and relaunch the less complicated the operation is. The
ScanEagle falls short in one way, its lack of ability to hover as it is solely
a fixed wing platform. Without the ability to hover the ScanEagle will only be
able to look at each hotspot for a short time before it flies by it or must
turn. This will be accounted for by having multiple UAS so there should be
minimal time between when each hotspot is viewed by a UAS. This can also help
as the images can be cross referenced between the UAVs in the data analysis so
each hotspot can be looked at to see if it is growing or shrinking, which helps
them identify the urgent ones to go after. With this short fall accounted for,
the use of the ScanEagle should lead to a successful mission.
Based
off of Insitu’s article on using scan eagles to fight fires, we plan to use the
Aliticam vision imaging system, with the dual Imager turret as it has both an
electro-optical and mid wave infrared cameras. They describe the payload that
they use as
“the
ScanEagle includes infrared sensors and electro-optical cameras that gather and
disseminate geospatial imagery and provide incident perimeter maps and full
motion video. The sensors and cameras spot heat signatures, fire movement and
spot fires, and provide video feed of critical infrastructure, historical
buildings and other structures that might be in danger, as well as identifying
safe ingress and egress routes for firefighters.” (Insitu, 2018)
For
the infrared sensor we plan on using a Mid-wave infrared (MWIR) camera, as it
can provide “Quality thermal imaging for nighttime and in low-visibility flights” (Insitu, 2019) , such as
smoke. This sensor will allow us to penetrate the smoke in the sky and see the forest
more clearly so we can better identify where the hotspot fires are.
The electro optical camera can help with the
operations during the daytime as it gives a better view of the fire, that the crews
on the ground would expect to see. The
vehicle does not need any modification to use the sensor package, and these
sensors are able to collect the necessary data for the mission.
When conducting an
operation on a wildfire, the biggest issue is monitoring the entire area at
once. UAS are smaller vehicles whos camera can only cover a limited section at
a single time. Since a wildfire will continue to grow until it has been
extinguished, this drawback could hinder the effectiveness at assisting
wildfire crews. To combat this issue, we plan to operate multiple ScanEagles over
the area.
With multiple
ScanEagles, the ground team can monitor the wildfire and direct firefighters to
areas that need to be focused on while also getting updated maps repeatedly as
each UAS orbits the fire. With multiple ScanEagles on sight, the amount of area
that can be covered is immense and ensures that there is a vehicle in the sky
at all times. This will also allow us to provide real time updates and upload
maps that can be shared with the firefighters without continiously stopping or
taking an extended period of time to cover a large area. The ScanEagle is a
good choice for data collection because it can provide “perimeter mapping, hot
spot locations, and points of interest” while also showing a “real-time video
feed.” (Insitu, 2018)
The
Scan eagle's camera systems collect geospatial imagery and that imagery can be
used with full motion video systems. In addition, the ScanEagle is equipped
with infrared sensors and electro-optical cameras to spot heat signatures and
fire movement as well as infrastructure that may be in danger due to the
spreading fire. The use of these can also provide maps for directing fire crews
and they can also monitor the fire live with the full motion video system. The
information collected aids in identifying safe passages for the firefighters to
make it to spot fires, and it can also aid in identifying escape routes if the
fire shifts.
LineVision could be
an option for geotagging hotspots. By using LineVision with the ScanEagle,
response teams can be provided with a map that has focus areas marked on it.
These maps will allow the response teams to act quickly and effectively at
locations that will help extinguish the fire faster.
In conclusion, the
use of Insitu Scan Eagles to monitor forest fires is the best UAS in our opion
given the situation and the data that needs to be collected. While we
acknowledge that there are other UAVs that could do similar operations, the scan
eagles were chosen for their flight time, sensor package and ability to use
live geospatial video as well as mapping. These factors help the UAV get
integrated into a complex airspace operation, and allow the UAV to help
increase response time and save lives in an everchaning enviroment.
Works Cited
Insitu. (2018, August 21). Insitu’s ScanEagle UAS
Proves Effective as a Wildfire Suppression Resource. Bengin, Washington, USA.
Retrieved from https://www.insitu.com/press-releases/ScanEagleUASProvesValuableforWildfireSuppressionEfforts
Insitu. (2019, September 30). Launcher Mark 4
Product Card. Retrieved from Insitu ScanEagle:
https://www.insitu.com/images/uploads/pdfs/Launcher_Mark4_SE_ProductCard_DU031317.pdf
Insitu. (2019, September 30). ScanEagle 3.
Retrieved from Insitu ScanEagle: https://www.insitu.com/scaneagle3#2
Insitu. (2019, September 30). ScanEagle Dual Imager
Product Card. Bingen, Washington, United States of America.
Insitu. (2019, September 30). Skyhook Universal.
Retrieved from Insitu ScanEagle:
https://www.insitu.com/images/uploads/pdfs/Skyhook_Universal_ProductCard_PR041615.pdf
Merino, L. C.-d.-d. (2012). An unmanned aircraft
system for automatic forest fire monitoring and measurement. Journal of
Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 65(1-4), 533-548.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
Comments
Post a Comment